Financial Services Reform Taskforce

To support efficient and effective implementation of the Government’s response, the Treasury Royal Commission Taskforce has continued as the Financial Services Reform Taskforce. The Government has provided $12.1 million to Treasury and the Office of Parliamentary Counsel (OPC) for implementation‑related Read More …

8.2 Additional oversight required

Each body with an oversight role in respect of APRA or ASIC serves an important, but limited, function. The current framework is heavily focused on governance and financial accountability.[1] None of the existing processes requires regular and systematic review of Read More …

5 Co-regulation by APRA and ASIC

The original conception of APRA from the Wallis Inquiry has shaped how it perceives its role, how it performs its functions and how it exercises its powers. Mr Wayne Byres, APRA’s Chair, put the matter plainly: [W]e don’t see ourselves Read More …

2.2 Changing culture

As I have said, each financial services entity is responsible for its own culture. Each must form a view of its culture, identify problems, develop and implement a plan to deal with them, and then determine whether the changes it Read More …

2.1 Supervising culture

2.1.1Responses to the GFC While prudential supervisors have no doubt formed views about the culture of financial institutions for many years, the idea that the culture of financial institutions was directly linked to financial soundness and stability only appears to Read More …

1.1 Background

1.1.1Responses to the GFC As the report of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) Prudential Inquiry into CBA noted, ‘remuneration practices at financial institutions globally came under a harsh spotlight during the Global Financial Crisis’.[1] The report said that remuneration Read More …