As noted above, in setting out this model for enforceable code provisions, I do not intend to interfere with the broader development of, or operation of, industry codes. Nor do I intend to modify or limit ASIC’s powers to approve the non-enforceable provisions of industry codes. With that said, I consider that the law should be amended to provide that ASIC may take into consideration whether particular provisions of an industry code of conduct have been designated as ‘enforceable code provisions’ in determining whether to approve a code.
I draw attention to this point because I consider it important that the banking industry, and (as I will come to) the insurance industry, continue to develop their industry codes over time. I expect that the non-enforceable provisions of industry codes will continue to play an important role in setting standards of behaviour within those industries over time.
Similarly, as will be apparent from what I have said, subject to the caveat with respect to insurance that I deal with in the appropriate chapter, I do not consider that any amendment should be made to the basic structure of internal and external dispute resolution.
|
Recommendation 1.15 – Enforceable code provisions The law should be amended to provide:
Recommendation 1.16 – 2019 Banking Code In respect of the Banking Code that ASIC approved in 2018, the ABA and ASIC should take all necessary steps to have the provisions that govern the terms of the contract made or to be made between the bank and the customer or guarantor designated as ‘enforceable code provisions’. |